Thank you for the opportunity to explain this time. All of our look mission would be to make certain in the event that you can find differences between users and you will non-users of dating software in the mating orientations (short-label and you may much time-term). “. Within our study, no particular causality (personalityapps use or software usepersonality) is intended. That have a cross-sectional build, we simply cannot establish one. You will find utilized the research we believe which is top appropriate a reaction to the research concern. Regarding the Abstract (p. 2, outlines 31-33), for-instance, we wrote:
It actually was found that, whereas dating applications profiles got increased quick-name mating direction than non-profiles (more regular decisions, highest desire, and much more great attitude), there have been no variations in the long-label direction as a function of explore/non-have fun with.
Right here, and additionally all through the newest manuscript, you will find demonstrated the outcome since the descriptive, not having any certain expectation out-of explanations and you can effects.
The procedure part offers good perception of the sample characteristics. The fresh new sample out-of pupils frequently diverge rather regarding a standard college student society regarding the new proportion off low-heterosexual youngsters. On the data almost step 1/3 of your youngsters have been categorized as being intimate minority. It is not chatted about about research constraints (insufficient representativeness).
Response: Thanks really for the comments and you can suggestion. All of our try is so unlike compared to education achieved various other geographical and you may social contexts, that have a high proportion off professionals off sexual minorities. not, our company is being unsure of on as to the reasons this ought to be a sign of use up all your of representativeness, although, definitely, we along with you should never verify representativeness of our own decide to try. The new testing for it analysis try comparable otherwise very similar to this new testing out of earlier degree about exact same browse group (see Table below).
First, our very own studies are not only biased from the sexual direction (high probability of involvement for non-heterosexual someone), also you to definitely bias continues to grow
A definite trend can be found. The brand new proportion off non-heterosexual people is actually broadening within our products. We are able to believe two choices to explain which. We can’t find any commercially probable factor for this. Second, from the populace out-of college students (The country of spain, an individual college), the clear presence of low-heterosexuality is actually growing. After that scientific studies are needed to describe this point.
I’ve tried to make this better from the changing the brand new name of our own manuscript, that’s now “Manage more youthful relationship application pages and you may non-profiles differ for the mating orientations?
Concerning the so you can intimate direction, several points would be detailed. Basic, the fresh high ratio out of members from sexual minorities, over 31% of one’s final take to. This is often regarded as too little representativeness your decide to try. I envision one to an alternative translation is achievable. This study offers that have earlier training a comparable testing method and you will inhabitants (Spanish university students with the exact same age range and on same college or university). We are going to inform you the time of data range additionally the proportion from intimate minority https://datingranking.net/nl/mamba-overzicht/ professionals: , 14.7% , , 8.6% . A very clear development is situated. The fresh new ratio away from intimate minority professionals try gradually broadening in our samples. We can envision one or two options to define which. We can’t discover any theoretically possible explanation for it potential alter out of bias round the date. Second, in reality regarding populace away from college students (Spain, just one college) the presence of non-heterosexuality is expanding. This 2nd choice would imply that the situation out-of representativeness are alot more noticeable one to actual. After that studies are needed to clarify this aspect. Regardless, within regression analyses we integrated intimate direction since covariate. Simultaneously, to help you helps this new analyses, we decided to group people with the heterosexuals and you may non-heterosexuals, for this reason dropping this new subtleties associated with the latest choices of members of intimate minorities.